| The fourth step in designing sales compensation | | | | focused only on selling, the rating would be 0%. If |
| plans is what the Pay Mix should be for each sales | | | | the role is focused on only service, the rating |
| role. Pay mix is the ratio between base salary and | | | | would be 100%. So depending on the focus of |
| incentive pay at target performance. Common | | | | the role, the rating would show the percentage |
| practices that impact this step are competitive | | | | within the range. Next would be the selling cycle. A |
| pay analysis, industry practices, compensation | | | | short selling cycle (how about 1 day) would be |
| philosophy, culture and job dimensions. | | | | 0% and a long selling cycle (how about 1 year or |
| In the competitive pay analysis, we would know | | | | longer) would be 100%. The rating could be |
| the base salary and total cash compensation | | | | somewhere in between. |
| levels at different percentiles in the market. For | | | | The next dimension is the influence on the sale. If |
| example, if the 50th percentile of base salary is | | | | your customers select your product solely |
| $50k and if the total cash level at the 50th | | | | because of the sales rep, the rating would be 0%. |
| percentile is $100k (meaning that incentive pay | | | | If your customers select your product solely |
| would be $50k), the pay mix would be 50/50. So | | | | because of your brand, or your programs or your |
| this is one data point in determining what pay mix | | | | systems, the rating would be 100% or |
| should be. | | | | somewhere in between. Next is about the |
| Another common consideration is industry | | | | account sales strategy. If the job dimension is |
| practice. What is the pay mix for your direct | | | | only to acquire new customers, the rating would |
| competitors for each sales role? Have you hired | | | | be 0%. If the job dimension is only to retain |
| sales talent from your competitors? Can a third | | | | existing customers, the rating would be 100%. |
| party assist you on collecting data from your | | | | The next dimension is sales skills. If anyone could |
| competitors? Are your competitors signaling their | | | | be hired into your sales role, the rating would be |
| pay mix during their hiring process? | | | | 0%. If there are specific criteria to hire new |
| Another common consideration goes back to the | | | | candidates into your sales role, such as an |
| sales compensation philosophy. Some companies | | | | engineering or nursing degree, the rating would be |
| select that their pay mix should be higher or | | | | 100%. Next is management control. If the sales |
| lower compared to the market. In these days, | | | | management process is to kick new hires out of |
| many companies would like to have a lower pay | | | | the office and tell them to sell, the rating would |
| mix (meaning a lower base salary percentage | | | | be 0%. |
| compared to the market). One of my clients | | | | If the sales management process is to have sales |
| recently hired a new CEO. He wanted every sales | | | | reps forecasting their accounts, inputting data into |
| role to have a pay mix of 60/40 or lower. It is | | | | the CRM system, having sales managers routinely |
| difficult to change overnight given that most of | | | | riding-along with the reps, filling out call reports, |
| the roles were paid at a pay mix of 80/20 or | | | | needing approval for pricing, etc. the rating would |
| higher. And many of the roles were account | | | | be 100%. The next dimension is product life cycle. |
| management roles which were pretty close to 80 | | | | If the product is completely new, the rating would |
| 20 in the market anyway. My recommendation | | | | be 0%. If the product is mature, such as |
| was not to "shock the monkey" as Peter Gabriel | | | | newspapers or telephone land lines, the rating |
| would say, but gradually move into a lowered pay | | | | would be 100%. Finally, what is the complexity of |
| mix strategy over time. | | | | the sale? If it's low such as selling shoes, the |
| Culture is another common consideration. One of | | | | rating would be 0%. If you're selling configured |
| my clients had a sales force that had a pay mix | | | | airplanes, the rating would be 100%. An average |
| of 0/100 meaning pay was delivered by incentive | | | | of all of these dimensions would provide another |
| only, no base salary. All of the other competitors | | | | data point for the Design Team in addition to |
| had a base salary in addition to incentive. My | | | | competitive pay analysis, philosophy, industry |
| client's culture inhibited the change until this year. | | | | practices and culture. |
| And I started with them 8 years ago and | | | | Let's assume that the average of all the |
| recommended at that time to modify the pay | | | | dimensions average 0%. The tool suggests that |
| mix. | | | | there would be no base salary and the role would |
| Another common consideration on pay mix is job | | | | be paid 100% on incentives. On the other side of |
| dimensions. This is where you can find | | | | the range, if the average is 100%, the tool |
| differentiation between business developers, | | | | suggests that there should be paid solely on base |
| account managers and territory sales reps for | | | | salary with no incentive pay. |
| example. I use a tool to help my clients to find | | | | I spent 11 years in the industrial gas business |
| another data point that gets closer to selecting | | | | (oxygen, nitrogen and argon) 15 years ago. I have |
| the right pay mix for the right sales role. | | | | a recent industrial gas client, and I filled out this |
| The first column is job dimensions for a specific | | | | tool based on my previous experience. It showed |
| sales role. The next column shows a range of | | | | an average of 65% which is a pay mix of 65/35. |
| ratings from 0 to 10. The last column is the rating | | | | When I reviewed their actual pay mix, it was 63 |
| in terms of a percentage out of 10. The first | | | | 37. Oftentimes, this tool can approximate reality. |
| dimension is the focus of the role. If the role is | | | | |